Literature Review Helper
Turn a pile of sources into themes, agreements, and open gaps.
What this agent helps with
- Clustering sources by theme
- Spotting agreement and conflict
- Surfacing research gaps
- Drafting a synthesis structure
Who it is for
- Researchers
- PhD students
- Analysts
Use-case preview
Explore this workflow
This agent is a preview of a workflow that can be built for you. Here is what it would do and how it would run.
Use-case preview
This agent is a use-case preview, not a live demo yet. Here is the workflow it represents:
Your input
You provide source summaries.
n8n orchestration
Routing, prompt assembly, and guardrails run privately inside n8n.
Agent reasoning
The agent clusters themes and finds gaps.
Structured output
Returns a synthesis structure.
Human review
Nothing is published or scheduled. You review and decide.
Want to test this one?
Book a consult to explore this workflow.
I can build a working version of this agent inside your own tools and scope what a safe, useful deployment would look like for your stack.
Demo limitations
- Works from summaries you provide.
- Not a citation manager.
- You verify and cite properly.
What a full deployment would include
- Connects to your reference manager
- Maintains a living thematic map
- Flags new sources to slot in
- Runs in your own tools
How it runs
Workflow diagram
Every request follows the same shape: your input goes to a private n8n workflow, the agent reasons over it, and a structured output comes back for your review.
- 1
Your input
You provide source summaries.
↓ - 2
n8n orchestration
Routing, prompt assembly, and guardrails run privately inside n8n.
↓ - 3
Agent reasoning
The agent clusters themes and finds gaps.
↓ - 4
Structured output
Returns a synthesis structure.
↓ - 5
Human review
Nothing is published or scheduled. You review and decide.
Want this adapted to your workflow?
Book a consult and I will adapt this agent inside your own tools — scoped for your stack, with the right guardrails, and nothing running without your say-so.